Fighter’ Review: Siddharth Anand’s Ill-Intentioned ‘Top Gun’ Rip-Off Induces Sleep, Not Nationalism”



Hey there, friends! Today, we’re going to chat about a movie called “Fighter,” directed by Siddharth Anand. Now, I know movies can be a personal taste, but let’s break down some stuff in a simple way, just like we’re having a cup of tea together.


Understanding the Movie’s Premise:

So, Fighter kicks off with some serious business – terrorists threatening India. Then, it jumps back a year to introduce us to Azhar Akhtar, who’s up to no good with terrorists and the Pakistan Armed Forces. Things get complicated, and our team of characters faces some challenges. There’s action, drama, and a bit of everything.


The Good Stuff – VFX and CGI:

Now, let’s give credit where it’s due – the visual effects and computer-generated imagery (VFX and CGI) in Fighter are pretty darn good. The planes, the skies, everything looks quite real. But here’s the catch – the director, Siddharth Anand, seems to have borrowed a bit too much from Top Gun and Top Gun: Maverick. It’s like he forgot to add his own touch, making the movie feel a bit like a copycat.


Unpacking the Movie’s Problems:

Now, let’s dive into the issues. Siddharth Anand’s Fighter seems to have some major problems. First off, it’s drowning in jingoism – that means it’s overly patriotic and a bit unrealistic. The movie tries to mix international rivalry with personal drama, and it’s a bit like a rollercoaster of emotions that might leave you with a headache.


The Big Problem – Lack of Originality and Bad Intent:

The director, Siddharth Anand, has a history of not being too original. But with Fighter, things take a darker turn. The movie blurs lines between terrorists and the government of Pakistan in a way that might not sit well with everyone. There’s also a touch of religious portrayal that might make you raise an eyebrow. It seems like the director has some not-so-great intentions hidden in his storytelling.


Tackling Tonal Whiplash and Unnecessary Drama:

Ever experienced whiplash? Well, Fighter might give you a bit of that. The movie shifts tones so abruptly – from international conflicts to personal stories – it can be hard to keep up. Also, the personal stories of the characters, while trying to be serious, end up feeling a bit forced and unconvincing.


Visuals and Product Placement:

Fighter looks more like an ad-film than a blockbuster. There’s so much product placement – from food delivery apps to phones – it’s like a shopping spree. And when it’s not selling products, the visuals somehow feel inauthentic. The editing is choppy, making scenes feel rushed and tiring.


The Elephant in the Room – Bigotry and Stereotypes:

Let’s talk about the not-so-great stuff. Fighter has its fair share of bigotry. The movie portrays Pakistan in a certain light that might not be fair, and it throws in some stereotypes for good measure. It also brings religion into the mix, painting a picture that could make some uncomfortable.



In a nutshell, Fighter is a poorly made, jingoistic, and rather boring movie. The story lacks creativity, the characters feel one-dimensional, and the performances, well, they’re just okay. If you’re into hypernationalism, maybe reconsider. We don’t need more angry folks. And if you’re looking for fighter jets in action, there are probably better options out there.



Leave a Comment